Indonesian traditional weapons in modern violence: a forensic case series of Three riot victims injured by the ‘sumpit’
Keywords:
sumpit, forensic, traditional weapon, penetrating trauma, riot injury, toxicologyAbstract
Background: Lawlessness is common among all walks of life: youth, adolescents, and adults. Incidents such as fights between students, murders, and misuse of traditional weapons are common and can lead to injuries or even death. The involvement of ‘sumpit’(blowgun), one of Indonesia's traditional weapons that are often used for violent purposes, often causes injuries that are very similar to those caused by modern weapons. This makes it difficult for medical and forensic experts to identify and analyze the cause of these injuries. In this study, we present the cases of three riot victims injured by chopstick throwing, examining the different injury patterns, the challenges faced by forensic teams, and the implications for health care providers and law enforcement. Case description: This case series describes three male patients(ages14,16,and19)who presented to the emergency department following a civil riot. All victims sustained penetrating trauma from projectiles launched from a traditional Indonesian sumpit. Clinical and forensic analyses revealed small, deep entry wounds mimicking low-velocity gunshot injuries, complicating initial assessment. Conclusion: Traditional weapons such as sumpit continue to pose a major challenge to medical experts and forensic professionals because the wounds inflicted have two separate but often co-occurring mechanisms: penetrative action and the risk of toxic poisoning. The results of this study highlight the urgent need for greater responsibility on the part of clinical and forensic practitioners, as well as increased public awareness. This study highlights the need for knowledge, preparedness, and ongoing medico legal care for trauma caused by conventional weapons by recording and examining these cases.
Downloads
References
Haris OK, Hidayat S, Sinapoy MS, Rahmat NR, Herman, Handrawan. Penegakan Hukum Pidanaterhadap Penyalah gunaan Senjata Tajam Tradisional(Criminal Law Enforcement Against the Misuse of Traditional Sharp Weapons). Halu Oleo Legal Research.2023;5(2):369–383.
Mac Phee N, Savage A,Noton N, et al. A comparison of penetration and damage caused by different types of arrow heads on loose and tight fit clothing. Sci Justice2018;58:109–120.
Rodríguez-Ramos A, Zapata-Castilleja CA, Treviño-González JL, etal. Frontal penetrating arrow injury: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2023;11:4117–4122.
Putri AR, Mauluddin M, Mathius D, et al. Laporan Kasus: Luka Tusuk Akibat Anak Panah. PREPOTIFJ Kesehat Masy2023; 7: 17025–17032.
Suwandono A, Atmoko WD. Types Of Fatal Trauma Examined In The Forensic Department Of Dr. Moewardi Hospital. Sebatik 2024;28: 256–261.
Julian JW, Todd ML, Marcheschi BJ, et al. Cross bow Injuries: Predictors of Mortality. Wilderness Environ Med 2024;35:119–128.
Zahorka H.B low pipe dart poison in Borneo and these creto fits production: the latex of Antiaristoxicaria; the poison-making procedure; the heat-sensitive main toxic chemical compound, and the lethal effect of the poison[Internet].The Free Library 2006.
Abdullahi H, Adamu A, Hasheem M. Penetrating arrow injuries of the head-and-neck region: Case series and review of literature. Niger Med J 2020;61:276.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Clinical Images and Case Reports

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Clinical Images and Case Reports




